breaking news

Print media not dead, snr exec tells REA Group

1069 people have read this article
Thursday, 23 February 2012

Simon Parker

Print media remains an important component of real estate marketing, and REA Group should utilise its links with News Limited products to ensure its long-term success, a former senior Telstra executive has said in a letter to the Fairfax-owned Australian Financial Review.

“REA’s Achilles heel is its seeming unwillingness to embrace its brothers at News to ensure its franchise is unassailable in the long term,” Ted Pretty, former group managing director at Telstra, wrote.

REA Group is majority owned by News Limited.

“For real estate, unlike the jobs, travel and dining verticals, there is a strong case to be made for a bundled offering of online advertising with high-quality regional/local print, particularly when the local agents own a chunk of the print.”

His letter was in response to comments made by REA Group CEO Greg Ellis that Fairfax’s recent purchase of the Melbourne-based The Weekly Review was a bad move by the publisher. It also comes immediately after REA Group announced a 32 per cent jump in net profit for the half year to December 2011.

“The purchase of The Weekly Review by Fairfax did two things for Fairfax,” he wrote. “First, founder Antony Catalano was eating Fairfax’s lunch as the viability of The Age was under threat from the loss of advertising – the acquisition was a necessity. Second, it has strengthened Fairfax’s hand in new strategies to take on REA in other markets.

“But Fairfax will not be without company as at least two new glossies are reportedly in the planning for the Sydney regions.”

Mr Pretty added that “News’ print guys have a lot to offer REA but presumably [Mr] Ellis doesn’t think so.”

He continued that Fairfax would seek to outspend REA Group on advertising the Domain brand – “a very expensive and primitive strategy” – while fellow online listings portal Homehound is expected to introduce a print strategy and Onthehouse “is enjoying a return to market favour and quietly building its online reach for modest cost.”

He added the market “should also watch out for the ‘Ray White’ family’s next steps.”

“This is all happening as the US online property portals think about their market entry strategies (and partners) for Australia.”

Mr Pretty, who is chairman of corporate advisory and investment firm CMB Capital, is also a director of the ASX-listed data centre operator Next DC and, and until its recent delisting, RP Data. He was also an executive director at Macquarie Capital Advisers for four years, and was CEO of Gulf Finance House and chairman of Fujitsu Australia.

Tony Blamey, general manager real estate, Fairfax Marketplaces (owner of Domain.com), told Real Estate Business that Ted Pretty’s comments were “an endorsement of our strategy.”

Domain offers agents listings in its newspapers – both at city level with The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times and through the local newspapers Fairfax owns across Australia – and online at domain.com.au, and via mobile technology.

Mr Blamey said Domain’s offering was part of a multi-channel strategy, of which mobile was becoming increasingly important, to the point where it is now a viable third channel in its own right.

“We’re leading the market [in mobile], and we’re approaching one million app downloads. One third of agent enquiries are now coming from mobile.”

Furthermore, Mr Blamey said Domain’s offering to agents extends beyond listings to include Australian Property Monitors (APM) – which is now 100 per cent owned by Fairfax – and the agent CRM system MyDeskTop.

“We are a real estate services business,” he added.

Mr Blamey added that listing numbers and agent subscriber levels have continued to grow for Domain, which stemmed in part from the necessary "marketing investment" Fairfax had made in the Domain brand.

He added that he wasn't aware of any US-based companies looking to enter the Australian online listings market.

REA Group declined to comment for this article, while Mr Pretty was unavailable at the time of writing.

E-mail
 

Comments  

 
0 #3 FAB 2012-02-29 07:44
You hit the nail on the head GW... 20 year olds don't read papers. however look at anyone 40+ and they will be sitting somewhere with a paper. Print is still a behaviour oriented medium. Its about your favourite writer or article and sitting back in a comfortable chair not suffering eyestrain for yet another 3 hours on the screen. Magazines are a good example... you buy what you are interested in. bottom line is you have to work with the demographics of the property you are marketing.
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+6 #2 GW 2012-02-23 19:07
Greg Ellis is right. Let's face it, he's come from Sensis and look at the churn happening in their print product. The writing is on the wall. The problem with newspaper traditionalists is that they refuse to believe that the print will die a natural death. There is nothing innovative about print. Online is a dynamic environment which allows flexibility with how you present to your audience. It is only limited by imagineering - no limits. What can print do? Nothing outside of articles which are "old hat" by the time they hit the streets, classifieds which can't be clicked thru to for more information and uninspiring features. Add to this the cost to market and print cannot compete - it's just a niche at best. This is evolution. I've worked with the biggest bunch of knuckleheads in Perth in newspapers - no strategy for online in the pipeline, no idea what to do. Print is the bell-bottomed pants of the 70s. Getting more old fashioned by the second. Ask any 20 year old.
Quote | Report to administrator
 
 
+4 #1 Steve 2012-02-23 14:02
OH Please, not another person who thinks print is making a comeback. If you have the SMH on the breakfast table and sneeze, it nearly blows away. The Rivers of Gold are now puddles in the creek. The SMH used to weigh about a kilo, now it would be less than half that. The cost of advertising in the newspaper is restrictive, and the circulation is pathetic. In the US last year 29% of general Advertising expenditure was spent in Newspapers, and the Consumers spent 6% of their total time spent searching advertising on the newspapers. Each year the disparity gets greater. We will follow that trend without doubt. And no, I have no connection with either newspapers or any online business.
Quote | Report to administrator
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh